Erin Brockovich and Environmental Justice.
- Kriti Shah
- Jan 15
- 6 min read
Updated: 3 days ago
~ Kashika Jain, O.P. Jindal Global University.
Introduction
Steven Soderbergh’s Erin Brockovich (2000)1 is a legal drama focused on a paralegal who discovers the industrial contamination of groundwater by Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) in Hinkley, California. The movie emphasizes a time when a single corporate entity not only goes against environmental safety but also hides the release of toxins to the local community, thereby causing adverse health and environmental effects. India’s major environmental laws, the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 (EPA 1986), provides an overall regulatory framework that gives the Central Government the power to control pollution, regulate the use of hazardous substances and take various measures for prevention. 2 Looking at Erin Brockovich through the lens of EPA 1986, helps us understand how the same contamination case would be handled in India theoretically. It also throws light on the challenges of enforcement, corporate transparency, and access to justice, which dominate the Indian environmental situation and have been there for a long time.
Regulatory Failure and Concealment
In the movie, Erin comes across medical records that are linked to property records and indicate the connection of chromium contamination to health problems. On the other hand, PG&E is deceiving the residents by saying that the chemical used is safe. So, the film reveals a regulatory system failure that is intentional concealment of the corporation. Under Section 3 of the Environment (Protection) Act 19863, the Central Government may “take all such measures as it deems necessary or expedient for the purpose of protecting and improving the quality of the environment.” 4 However, Indian environmental management has had a history of challenges in accountabilities of monitoring and corporate disclosure, especially when locating contamination that requires access to information from the polluter.
Corporate Secrecy and Judicial Responses
Indian environmental laws through the courts have always been very vocal against the problem of corporate secrecy. In Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v Union of India5, the Supreme Court faced stiff chemical contamination resulting from the industrial units in Rajasthan and also put the blame on the regulatory authorities for their failure to avert the damage to ecology that was going to last for a long time. 6 In the Bichhri Village Industrial Pollution line of cases7, the Court, similarly, recognized the state's inability to keep a check on the hazardous industries and, therefore, stressed the authority's obligation to engage in preventive measures. 8
Investigation and Enforcement Challenges
The film’s depiction of the in-depth investigation of a case by a single brave and determined person finds a reflection in India in quite a different manner. Here, such investigations are achieved through public interest litigation and community-driven environmental activism instead of regular intervention by the authorities. In spite of the fact that EPA 1986 confers extensive powers on the authorities, as a matter of fact the onus of the investigation is frequently handed over to the civil society, journalists and local people. So, the film’s illustration of the officials’ hiding and their indifference to the issue resonates with the situation in India, which shows that mere legal provisions do not ensure effective monitoring if there is no institutional readiness, technical support and provisions for disclosure.
Government Powers to Control Polluting Corporations
The movie's main legal issue that was at the core of the discussion was the question of the government's power to control polluting corporations. Under Section 5 of the Environment (Protection) Act 19869, the Central Government may issue binding directions “including the power to direct the closure, prohibition or regulation of any industry, operation or process.” 10 Such a "command-and-control" model, in theory, ensures that the authorities respond to the problem more quickly than through the tort litigation that is of an adversarial nature.
Environmental Principles in Indian Jurisprudence
In Vellore Citizens' Welfare Forum v Union of India11, the Supreme Court formally acknowledged the precautionary principle and the polluter pays principle as the core principles of Indian environmental law.12 The Court went a step further to indicate that the requirement for the state to refrain from causing environmental harm should be the very decision-making logic even if there is a lack of scientific evidence. Correspondingly, in A P Pollution Control Board v Prof M V Nayudu13, the Court also saw scientific knowledge to be limited and thus urged the establishment of specialised environmental authorities for decision-making.14
Weak Enforcement and Industrial Influence
Where there is statutory authority, the Indian environmental scene is still plagued by bureaucratic delays, political pressures and limited enforcement capacity. Just as PG&E in the movie was able to influence the evidentiary narrative, Indian industries also regularly challenge regulatory orders, dispute scientific findings and use administrative resources to delay their compliance. Thus, even though the EPA 1986 provides the authorities with strong legal instruments, the enforcement is still patchy and polluting entities are often able to retain a considerable degree of influence over the regulatory results.
Settlement versus Structural Remedies
The resolution in Erin Brockovich is largely a financial settlement to those living in the area who were impacted. Although the settlement pays off the victims, it brings few changes to the system and is based heavily on confrontational litigation. On the other hand, the Indian legal system is more focused on providing structural solutions through the implementation of environmentally just measures, the polluter pays principle and precautionary regulation. In the case of Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action, the Court held that the polluting industries could be required to make the environment clean and pay for the costs of the cleanup. 15
Policy Solutions and Institutional Reform
Different policy initiatives could be used under Indian law to deal with similar illegal contaminations. First of all, regulatory authorities should, on their own initiative, and through the use of the power granted by the law, order the immediate cessation of activities which are causing pollution or should require that an environmental audit be conducted if contamination is suspected in a certain area. Secondly, there should be reliance on the data which comes from independent environmental laboratories and expert committees, rather than industrial disclosures, in the case of the need to provide scientific proof. Thirdly, the public should be given the opportunity to participate, and this should be guaranteed by measures of openness, EIA and consultations with the community.
In addition, there should be more reliable mechanisms for the implementation of the precautionary principle as well as for the operation of these mechanisms. The judicial authority in Vellore Citizens’ Welfare Forum, after reviewing the case, stated that sustainable development is only possible if the need for environmental protection in the regulation of industry is recognized; however, it also pointed out that this is only achievable by increasing institutional capacity and by the development of specialized environmental knowledge. Although the National Green Tribunal is a mechanism that came into existence after the Environment Protection Act 1986, it represents a structural innovation that is meant to address the complexities arising out of scientific issues and to shorten the time required for the resolution of environmental disputes.16 A case that would be the Indian equivalent of the Hinkley dispute should be settled, by means of a court decision, quickly and the emphasis should be put on remediation and preventive measures rather than on the litigation which lasts for decades and which ends only with compensation.
Conclusion
Erin Brockovich tells the compelling story of corporate misconduct, community suffering and the personal struggle to expose environmental wrongdoing. Through the lens of India's Environment (Protection) Act 1986, the movie raises fundamental questions about the power of the regulator, the accountability of the corporation and the rights of the victims. Although Indian law provides for more direct regulatory intervention than the American tort model, the issues raised in the film regarding concealment, difficulty in obtaining evidence and institutional inertia, are India’s environmental reality. The courts have, through such landmark litigation as Vellore Citizens’ Welfare Forum, Nayudu and Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action, acknowledged environmental principles. However, their enforcement is still limited by the local authority. In the end, Erin Brockovich is a cautionary tale that environmental justice is not only a matter of legal provisions but also depends on their enforcement, transparency in terms of science and real involvement of the communities affected.
Footnotes: 1 Erin Brockovich (Universal Pictures 2000).
2 Environment (Protection) Act 1986.
3 Environment (Protection) Act 1986, s 3
4 Environment (Protection) Act 1986, s 3(1).
5Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v Union of India (1996) 3 SCC 212.
6 Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v Union of India (1996) 3 SCC 212.
7 Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v Union of India (1996) 3 SCC 212
8 Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v Union of India (1996) 3 SCC 212
9 Environment (Protection) Act 1986, s 5
10 Environment (Protection) Act 1986, s 5
11 Vellore Citizens’ Welfare Forum v Union of India (1996) 5 SCC 647.
12 Vellore Citizens’ Welfare Forum v Union of India (1996) 5 SCC 647.
13 A P Pollution Control Board v Prof M V Nayudu (1999) 2 SCC 718.
14 A P Pollution Control Board v Prof M V Nayudu (1999) 2 SCC 718.
15 Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action (n 3).
16 National Green Tribunal Act 2010
Comments